Full regulatory approval over 12 months away and a backlash from authors worried about a less competitive book publishers‘ market may not be the only issues facing the merger deal between Bertelsmann, owner of the Random House book publishing unit, and Pearson’s Penguin Group. The Week reports that Rupert Murdoch’s Harpercollins book publishing outfit is looking to offer up to $1.6 bn for the acquisition of Penguin, which would effectively scupper the deal.

As has now been widely reported, about five months ago, a representative of Pearson PLC contacted Bertelsmann SE & Co. The result of that contact emerged Monday, when the two companies unveiled the creation of Penguin Random House, a combination they hope will be better able to deal with the digital transformation of the book industry.

The timing of the initial approach came at a pivotal moment in book publishing. A few weeks before, the U.S. Justice Department filed an antitrust suit against Apple Inc. and five major publishers, including Penguin, alleging an price-fixing conspiracy regarding e-books. While three of the publishers settled, two continue to fight the suit, including Penguin.

Random House wasn’t involved in the suit.

Books from publishers Penguin and Random House on a bookstore shelf in London on Friday. The two houses have announced a deal to merge.

The settlement forced publishers to allow a resumption of discounted pricing of e-books, which Amazon.com Inc. had championed after it introduced its Kindle e-reader in 2007 but which had been shut down by the publishers in 2010. The implication of a new round of discounting was immediately clear: It could eventually weaken Barnes & Noble Inc., the major competitive force against Amazon.

And book executives see that as bad news. While e-books are good for publishers’ profit margins, by removing the costs of printing and distribution, the worry was that a more powerful Amazon could eventually squeeze publishers on prices.

For book publishing, an industry dominated by a half-dozen big players, consolidation was one answer. Combining forces would allow publishers to gain more heft in negotiating terms with retailers, including Amazon, industry executives said. By moving first, Pearson hoped to gain an advantage, a person familiar with the situation said.

“In reviewing the long-term trends and considerable change affecting the consumer publishing industry, Pearson and Bertelsmann both concluded that the publishing and commercial success of Penguin and Random House can best be sustained and enhanced through a partnership with another major international publishing house,” the companies said in a joint statement.

The companies’ boards approved the plan Sunday, despite a last-minute expression of interest in buying Penguin that came from News Corp., parent of HarperCollins publishers. News Corp., which also owns The Wall Street Journal, never made a formal offer, a person familiar with the situation said.

The Pearson board considered all options, including a cash sale, but unanimously supported the joint-venture structure with Bertelsmann, the person said.

Selling Penguin would have triggered a big capital-gains tax liability, another person familiar with the situation said.The companies said they hoped to complete the merger in the second half of next year, pending regulatory approvals. The attitude of antitrust regulators in the U.S. and Europe is an open question.

Management of the new company will be split between the two publishers: Random House Chief Executive Markus Dohle, 44 years old, will be CEO while Penguin CEO John Makinson, 58, will be chairman.

The deal highlights how the rapid adoption of digital books is changing book publishing. The proportion of consumer-book revenue for publishers coming from e-books rose to 14.8% last year from 6.3% in 2010, according to BookStats. A publishing executive said that at his company, e-books could account for 30% to 50% of fiction sales now.

E-books should be good news for publishers. In addition to the lower production and distribution costs, unsold books don’t come floating back from retailers. Those returned book can reach 30% to 40% of a print run, even on best sellers, an executive said.

But as physical books decline as a proportion of total sales, the fixed costs of maintaining warehouses and printing facilities hurts overall margins. Some publishers already have started to address this. HarperCollins, for example, has closed two of its four warehouses in the U.S. The combined Penguin Random House will have between them four warehouses in the U.S., raising the possibility that some could be closed.

Mr. Dohle said the two companies were just starting to analyze the potential cost savings, including those in distribution, warehousing and information technology. But “this deal isn’t based on synergies; it is based on future growth,” he said.

Mr. Makinson said the merger will allow the companies to invest more heavily in social media and other new technologies. With fewer traditional bookstores around, he said, “it becomes harder and riskier to take a chance on new writers because you can’t be sure of finding an audience.” Social media can help remedy that.

Some book agents have voiced concerns about the impact of the merger. Mr. Makinson emphasized that authors won’t see significant changes because the two companies intend to keep the same number of publishing imprints.

Scott Turow, best-selling author and president of the Authors Guild, said: “Publishers are facing a new reality with some of the biggest companies in the world, including Google, Apple and Microsoft entering their field. I understand why they want to get bigger. But what I haven’t thought through yet is what the down side is for the cultural landscape.”

The deal was announced just a few weeks after Pearson’s longtime chief executive, Marjorie Scardino, disclosed plans to step down at year-end. Her departure sparked speculation about whether the incoming CEO, John Fallon, would focus the company on educational publishing, the area of the company he runs, exiting businesses such as consumer books.

Each company is committed to staying in the book venture for the first three years. After that, Pearson has options to raise cash from its stake, including by requesting a debt-financed dividend payment. Both companies can call for an initial public offering of the venture after five years.

Book publisher and Self Publishing Information provided by S&D book publishers and christian book publishers as a courtesy.
Share
Comments Off

The Morning News Tournament of Books is BACK! For the uninitiated, this is a 16-book, bracket-style “tournament” designed to crown the . . . well, I’ll just let them explain it:

Today we’re announcing the shortlist for the 2012 Tournament of Books (for novels, of course, published in 2011) only a week or so into the New Year. See, this is the space where we remind everybody what a folly this exercise is. It’s stupid. A tiny and secretive cadre of people telling everyone else what the best novels of the year are is every bit as ridiculous as an electoral system where anonymously endowed Super PACs tell everyone else which willfully ignorant global-warming denier should be president.

Like we said, stupid. But we do it anyway. And the one thing we humbly offer is transparency, and a rooster for the winner. We do not meet in a closed conference room and slide our decision under the door scribbled on the back of a car-wash receipt, like they do with the Pulitzer. And unlike the National Book Award, we have a series of fail-safes designed to preserve the integrity of our prize by ensuring that we do not mistakenly include books that are homophones of the actual finalists in our shortlist. We are proud to say that the system ultimately worked, but not in time to avoid an apologetic phone call to to the biographer of British painter Copley Fielding.

In the Tournament of Books, you will know who the judges are. What their biases are. Which books they choose and why they are choosing them. In the past we’ve had judges who flipped coins. Judges who picked the book with the prettiest cover. Judges who didn’t finish one of the books. Judges who didn’t finish either book. Once we had a judge who so hated both books we had to literally subdue him physically to make him choose. (When we say “literally” we really do mean literally, though when we say “physically” we mean “politely in an email.”)

In other words, this is the best, non-serious book tournament being played (?) today. And as always, I think their list of 16 books sucks almost as bad as that stupid BCS thing and everything in the state of Alabama.

First off, the judges are definitely top-notch: Emma Straub, Mark Binelli, Oscar Villalon, Bethanne Patrick, Alex Abramovich, Walter Kirn, others.

But the books! Ugh. OK, maybe “meh” is more appropriate. Obviously, I’m disappointed that ONCE AGAIN, they overlooked all Open Letter titles. Zone, Scars, My Two Worlds, could compete with any of the 16 titles “they” selected.

I’ve only read parts of a few of these books, but just because it’s Wednesday, I’m going to break the field down into a few categories:

Deserve to Be There

Nathacha Appanah, The Last Brother (Go Graywolf!)

Teju Cole Open City (Sebald version 2011)

Helen Dewitt, Lightning Rods (Gloryholes! And I wrote about this for Rolling Stone)

Karen Russell, Swamplandia (Karen loves Bragi Olafsson’s The Ambassador!)

Kate Zambreno, Green Girl (We go way way back)

Had to Be There

Julian Barnes, The Sense of an Ending (Even his blank pages win awards)

Patrick DeWitt, The Sisters Brother (I know nothing about this except that it’s referenced everywhere)

Jeffrey Eugenides, The Marriage Plot (Probably good, and ordained as such months before publication)

Chad Harbach, The Art of Fielding (See The Marriage Plot)

Haruki Murakami, 1Q84 (Big, totalizing, mesmerizing, infects your dreams—we get it already)

Jesmyn Ward, Salvage the Bones (Automatic inclusion since it won the National Book Award)

If This Book Had a Face I’d Punch It

Tea Obreht, The Tiger’s Wife (OK, that’s really mean. I’m just so terribly sick of hearing about this book)

Books That Should Be Replaced with Open Letter/New Directions/Archipelago/NYRB Titles

Alan Hollinghurst, Stranger’s Child (Just the description makes me feel tired)

Michael Ondaatje, The Cat’s Table (We swam in the Blue Lagoon together)

Ann Patchett, State of Wonder (I have no opinion about this)

Donald Ray Pollock, Devil All the Time (Unless this book is set in Felicity, OH, I don’t care)

When this gets started in March, we’ll post some further sarcastic commentary. For now, you should order all 16 titles (+ the three Open Letter ones) from Powells.com the official sponsor of the contest.

Share
Comments Off
Written By: 
Caroline Horn

Publication Date: 
Mon, 16/05/2011 – 15:15

BBC1’s "The One Show" will question publishers’ policy towards ghostwriting tonight (16th May). The show will focus on ghostwritten celebrity books and children’s branded books that claim to be written by a famous author when they have been written by somebody else.

Among the cases highlighted on the show will be Katie Price’s adult and children’s books (Random House) and Enid Blyton’s Wishing Chair continuation titles (Egmont Press), in which the real author’s name is "hidden".

read more

Share